Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  9 / 32 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 9 / 32 Next Page
Page Background

I N N O V AT I O N S • V O L . V I I I , N O. 1 • 2 0 1 6

7

Operators Driving Positive Change

Operators investing in modern ILI tools are seeing

more and more potential calls for corrosion of

or along the long seam, sometimes hundreds in

just a few dozen kilometers. The initial concern

with multiple indications of corrosion is how

to prioritize the threats. Which ones should the

company dig first to maintain the safest possible

pipelines – to get to the biggest threats quickly?

To overcome this issue, T.D. Williamson

(TDW), a pipeline services company, is developing

a classification model to help prioritize SSWC

corrosion threats.

To develop the model, the TDW team first

needed some base data points. Partnering with a

U.S.-based pipeline operator, TDW selected areas

to dig and analyze in the ditch, then compared

these data sets to existing ILI data produced by

the TDW proprietary Multiple Dataset (MDS)

platform, which provides various inspection

technologies on one tool.

Some high-level data analysis, regressions, and

many late nights later, data scientists were able to

produce a SSWC classifier model – a mathematical

model that uses the ILI data not only to establish

the probability that corrosion of or along the seam

is in fact SSWC, but also to estimate the depth and

length of the corrosion.

Better yet, this new model enables classifications,

at least in part, to be automated – eliminating many

of the man hours needed to manually prioritize a

run with hundreds of anomalies.

Fast Reaction to the Most

Imminent Threats

Results are promising.

In one preliminary test, more than 175

anomalies were identified, out of which 90

candidates were selected as potentials for SSWC.

With the new classifier model, just 14 were

categorized with a probability of 40 percent or

greater to be SSWC, and only 11 indicated a

probability of greater than 70 percent.

The research was presented to the PHMSA

Central Region in Kansas City, Kansas, in

December 2015. “They were keen on the work

and interested in the results as they develop,”

says Chuck Harris, manager of strategic

commercialization at TDW. “They even requested

to be in the ditch on some of the digs.”

Ideally, the ILI runs will one day generate a

complete prioritization of potential SSWC threats,

so operators can start their digs at the top of the

list and work their way down. The technology is

currently in field trials, and additional results will

be reported later in 2016.

New Classifier Model for Selective

Seam Weld Corrosion (SSWC)

as sampled in preliminary testing

175+

Anomolies identified

90

Candidates for SSWC

14

40% probable

11

70% probable

SSWC is of particular

concern for a few reasons:

• Traditionally difficult to detect with

conventional inline inspection (ILI) tools.

• SSWC can cause a pipeline to rupture

even under low stress conditions.

• Selective corrosion grows in service

faster than adjacent pitting corrosion.